SOCIAL BENEFITS

(SINGH, 2017)
The fashion industry is the second most polluting industry, simply after the oil business. When you consider the harmful procedures used to make garments and measure of waste it creates, it all makes sense. Slow fashion brands manufacture their clothing while at the same time thinking long haul sustainability as a main priority. They utilize secure and ethical practices which decreases the utilization of harmful chemicals (TrustedClothes, 2017). Slow fashion shows up as a contrasting option to socially and environmentally unsustainable works due to the facilitated fashion cycle in the fast fashion technique. By slowing down the manufacturing pattern of garments, the environment and people in the environment can co-exist together healthier, also enabling time for the environment to recover (Jung and Jin, 2016). Manufacturing and designing a more sustainable garment can both be theoretically straightforward and disappointingly complex.
Life-cycle thinking reveals that for sensibly last-longing clothing that do not devour energy, expanding the item’s lifetime will bring “Substantial environment benefits” (Black, 2013, p. 215). The utilization of assets and the measure of waste are reduced in slow fashion because items are made slowly in small amounts. The quality of life for all workers are enhanced due to slower production, ensuring their basic rights by displacing the time weight in the generation of apparel which enables the workers to invest more time and energy in each piece of clothing thus enhancing the quality of the clothing (Jung and Jin, 2016).
​
In February 2017, Mango uncovered another womenswear and menswear collection focused on “Environmental sustainability”.
The pieces are produced using sustainable textiles, for example, “natural cotton and recycled polyester and dyed with environmental-friendly inks”. Mango is additionally building up an inside tool to estimate its “water footprint” and ways to decrease water consumption.
Zara propelled a sustainable clothing range called “Join Life” for autumn/winter 2016. The garments are made with the use of “Environmentally-friendly materials, for example, “natural cotton, recycled wool and Tencel. Zara has been hoping to build awareness in the range with a committed advertising campaign and social media content urging its consumers to post about their own ethical decisions.
Since February 2017, Adidas started selling a new swimwear collection in the UK, which is made with the use of “recycled ocean plastics”. The textile is made with the use of “old fishing nets” and other sea plastics that have then been transformed into a specialized yarn.
“C&A has made a Cradle to Cradle affirmed gold t-shirt that can be composted”. It intends to close the resource circle in manufacturing, with the unused of one item being utilized for the creation of another. (Sender, 2017)
LONDON FASHION WEEK
London Fashion week (LFW) is under the strain to advance a more sustainable fashion industry as the British Fashion Council (BFC) required the fashion division to follow in the strides of other sectors and do its bit for the environment (Mintel, 2018)
SOCIAL BENEFITS AND COST OF SLOW FASHION
​
It is never long before the subject of cost is brought up when discussing about sustainable and ethical fashion. It is reasonable, as sustainable fashion costs incomparably more than that of fast fashion; creating a genuine “financial barrier” to a huge measure of individuals. As far as affordability, there is no doubt that sustainable fashion frequently falls a long way behind the high-street. Ethical brands generally conduct fair wage strategies, bringing about such low costs a “Financial impossibility” (Benson, 2017). Slow fashion depicts the procedure of producing clothing ethically while considering the workers and environment. Slow fashion companies guarantee the labourers are paid reasonable wages and are given a sheltered workplace. Manufacturing clothing in ethical methods are mostly high-priced, bringing about more costly garments. Be that as it may, they are produced using better-quality materials, which are substantial and will last longer than garments made using fast fashion methods (TrustedClothes, 2017).
Contrasted with the ultra-low cost of fast fashion, slow fashion can appear to be costly. In any case, it can be contended that fast fashion has biased our feeling of significant worth (Jen, 2016)
“We now think that a £5 t-shirt is normal when in reality it should cost way more than £5 to make a t-shirt. We need to stop and think about how that £5 t-shirt is made and who is making it. That £5 t-shirt has a huge environmental and social cost. Given the impact of that £5 t-shirt, maybe the cost of ethical fashion is actually what clothes should cost. If paying people fair wages and treating them ethically and protecting the environment means our clothes cost a little more, then is this not a fair price to pay” (Jen, 2016).
YOUNG MILLENNIALS ON SLOW FASHION
Young consumers demonstrate the most enthusiasm for sustainable fashion, with Mintel's “consumer research highlighting that 44% of younger Millennials aged 17-26 would like to see more eco-friendly fabrics used in clothes. This compares with only 34% of Generation X and 30% of Baby Boomers”.
“Young female Millennials in particular are driving this shift in attitudes, with almost half (48%) interested in more environmentally friendly clothing.”
“Mintel’s Moral Brands Trend notes how consumers are often too lazy, cash-strapped or short of time to turn their ethical sentiments into action, prompting them to look for retailers and brands to do the good work for them.” (Sender, 2017)
Regardless of good aims, it can be hard to transform “ethical sentiments” into action, and “low-valued fashion” keeps on being the principle need when purchasing garments; 80% of young ladies matured 16-24 predominantly search at low costs when looking for garments. It is in this way up to retailers and brands to help support reasonable utilization.
Mango, Zara, ASOS and H&M have all as of late propelled naturally agreeable extents targeted at youthful, fashion cognizant consumers (Mintel, 2017). This includes a dress made of “recycled shoreline” squander inside its “Conscious Exclusive range”. These retailers have been maintained by the high state of enthusiasm for sustainable fashion amid young ladies (Mintel, 2017).
​
​
"THE FUTURE OF DESIGN HAS TO MOVE BEYOND THE TRADITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LUXURY: BEAUTY, DESIRE AND EXCLUSIVITY. A FIRST STEP THAT HAS BEEN TAKEN BY MANY ENVIRONMENTALLY AWARE LUXURY BRANDS IS TO USE RECYCLED MATERIALS." (Jung and Jin, 2016)

SLOW FASHION AND YOUNG CONSUMERS
With youthful millennials thriving enthusiasm for ethical issues, and the broadness of “cool niche brands” propelling to take care of that demand, offers a small gap for change. According to Aflalo, modern, and for the most part more youthful consumers, are more cognizant and need to find out about where their items are originating from.
Consumers are currently hoping to roll out an improvement.
They need to find out about the how and the who behind the garments they wear in order to comprehend the story behind their garments (Saner, 2017).
(SANER, 2017)
REFERENCE LIST
​
Benson, S. (2017). The Cost Issue: Why Does Ethical Fashion Cost More?. [online] Sophie Benson. Available at: http://sophiebenson.com/2017/10/the-cost-issue-why-does-ethical-fashion-cost-more/[Accessed 12 Mar. 2018].
Black, S. (2013). The sustainable fashion handbook. New York: Thames & Hudson.
Jen (2016). Is Ethical Fashion Only For The Wealthy or Can We All Afford it?. [online] The Sustainable Edit. Available at: http://www.thesustainableedit.com/is-ethical-fashion-only-for-the-wealthy/[Accessed 12 Mar. 2018].
Jung, S. and Jin, B. (2016). From quantity to quality: understanding slow fashion consumers for sustainability and consumer education. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(4), pp.410-421.
Jung, S. and Jin, B. (2016). Sustainable Development of Slow Fashion Businesses: Customer Value Approach. Sustainability, 8(12), p.540.
Mintel (2018). London Fashion Week calls for industry to be more sustainable
[online] Academic.mintel.com. Available at: http://academic.mintel.com/display/884995/?highlight [Accessed 12 Mar. 2018].
Mintel (2017). Sustainable movement driven by the young. [online] Academic.mintel.com. Available at: http://academic.mintel.com/display/835073/?highlight#hit1[Accessed 22 Mar. 2018].
Mintel (2017). Young fashion brands tap into sustainability movement. [online] Academic.mintel.com. Available at: http://academic.mintel.com/display/835039/?highlight#hit1[Accessed 5 Apr. 2018].
Saner, E. (2017). Sustainable style: will Gen Z help the fashion industry clean up its act?[online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2017/apr/25/sustainable-clothing-fashion-revolution-week-rana-plaza-emma-watson[Accessed 21 Mar. 2018].
Sender, T. (2017). Fashion chains unveil sustainable collections. [online] Academic.mintel.com. Available at: http://academic.mintel.com/display/830597/?highlight [Accessed 21 Mar. 2018].
Sender, T. (2017). Young Millennials drive interest in eco fashion. [online] Academic.mintel.com. Available at: http://academic.mintel.com/display/830597/?highlight[Accessed 21 Mar. 2018].
TrustedClothes (2017). Forget Fast Fashion: Slow Fashion Industry’s Sustainable Efforts – Trusted clothes. [online] Trusted Clothes. Available at: https://www.trustedclothes.com/blog/2017/06/12/forget-fast-fashion-slow-fashion-industrys-sustainable-efforts/[Accessed 22 Feb.2018]
Vinandomi.com. (2018). VIN AND OMI. [online] Available at: http://www.vinandomi.com[Accessed 12 Mar. 2018].